Force Union Forum


Force vs. Sumeka

Offline Bennisia

  • Citizens
  • Newbie
  • *
    • Posts: 13
    • Karma: +0/-6
    • View Profile
on: July 07, 2020, 12:58:00 pm
I, Bennisia, on behalf of the people of the Union of Force hereby request that the court empanel a jury and bring the following charges against Sumeka:

Voter Fraud
4.3. Attempting to or successfully undermining the validity of an election by means of something other than that mentioned in §I.4.1 and §I.4.2.


Sumeka has made false and irrelevant allegations of voter fraud against me during a General Election.  The law as it stands states the following;

‘Article 3: Parties in regional elections 1. A candidate should clarify in their candidacy announcement for any office what party they are affiliated with, or if they are independent. 2. Parties may decide independently how they choose candidates for election.’

It is worth noting that the Constitution has absolutely no say over what happens within political parties. As ‘unconstitutinal’ institutions, they operate outside of the refines of the constitution. They are not liable to the same laws that Regional institutions like the Cabinet or Court are, so any complaints regarding the DPP primaries should be immediately thrown out, and it is worrying that they have even been accepted at this stagIe. Any complaints about the primary had the opportunity to be addressed when Sumeka was a member of the DPP and if he felt so strongly about them he could have complained to the Party Chair. Instead, he left the party, along with the rest of the establishment who were upset about my win. It is also worth noting that the Constitution states that ‘Harassment is defined as repeated or continuing contact serving no useful purpose except to create alarm, annoyance, or cause emotional distress.’ As you will see from the evidence that he has given you (though not made public), at no point have any individuals asked me to cease or desist contact, so one would not be able to reasonably assume that they felt ‘harassed’. It is a matter of subjectivity.

It is a matter of utmost urgency that this election interference is addressed. Not only is it a waste of the Court's time to make these kinds of allegations, but it shows Sumeka is ignorant of the Constitution and the role it plays in terms of political parties and their internal workings.

I am in this region and involved in it's politics because I love it and I want to help Force, yet the region's establishment seems to be out to get me, as is evident by Sumeka, clearly emotional over his defeat in the DPP primaries, collating and gathering 'evidence' that I have somehow meddled in elections. This is borderline obsessive and I consider it harassment.
The Democratic Republic of Bennisia, Leader of the Democratic People's Party
Bennisia II - Heart Immigration Minister


Offline Lashnakia

  • House Representative
  • Sr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 287
    • Karma: +51/-8
    • View Profile
Reply #1 on: July 07, 2020, 01:24:37 pm
1. There is evidence that is not false, which we have possession of.
2. Let’s go through this, shall we:
3. >>> Article 3: Parties in regional elections
4. 1. A candidate should clarify in their candidacy announcement for any office what party they are affiliated with, or if they are independent. 2. Parties may decide independently how they choose candidates for election.
5. You are technically correct, parties do choose independently. However, that is House Law, which constitutional law is technically above. So, let’s look at the constitution.
6. ‘4. Voting Fraud
7. 4.1. Attempting to or successfully undermining the validity of an election through the creation of multiple accounts.4.2. Attempting to or successfully undermining the validity of an election, referendum, or vote of any other kind by bringing in nations to vote for one or more specific candidates or ideas.4.3. Attempting to or successfully undermining the validity of an election by means of something other than that mentioned in §I.4.1 and §I.4.2.’
8. Your voter fraud falls into 4.3. It states nowhere parties are exempt, you are undermining the validity of an election in some fashion.
9. Constitutional law is above House Law. Therefore, you have no case.
10. You have not been harrassed, you have been victimising yourself for every slight criticism. Grow up.
11. There is evidence that the only one interfering in the election is you, and can be provided if you wish.
12. The only one here who is ignorant to the constitution is yourself.
I am not a court member and therefore exert no influence on the court, but I have do have the right to free speech.


Offline Bennisia

  • Citizens
  • Newbie
  • *
    • Posts: 13
    • Karma: +0/-6
    • View Profile
Reply #2 on: July 07, 2020, 01:29:42 pm
nobody called you to give evidence you can't just run into court and start mouthing off so just shush lol.
The Democratic Republic of Bennisia, Leader of the Democratic People's Party
Bennisia II - Heart Immigration Minister


Offline Lashnakia

  • House Representative
  • Sr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 287
    • Karma: +51/-8
    • View Profile
Reply #3 on: July 07, 2020, 02:19:25 pm
nobody called you to give evidence you can't just run into court and start mouthing off so just shush lol.

I have the right to free speech, read the constitution.


Offline Tigslarlowducken

  • Global Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 229
    • Karma: +127/-14
    • View Profile
Reply #4 on: July 07, 2020, 05:25:02 pm
Case dismissed.
You are now breathing manually