Debate: General Elections, July 2020
Debates close on July 8 at 12:53 PM EDT.
Brief OverviewThe Debate period is intended to be a time in which citizens can assess the competence of candidates running for office and make an informed decision in the voting period that follows. All citizens may ask questions to the candidates and while the candidates are not legally bound to answering these questions, it is highly encouraged. Candidates are however legally bound to answer all questions asked of them by the Founder.
Candidates for Prime MinisterAzerubia (FED-F)
Krovx Belgium (FED-RGBN)
Candidates for House of RepresentativesThe Scottish Republic (FED-H)
Empire of Elysium (FED-H)
Sidervida (FED-F)
Hyperian Parmonte (UPP-HYPE)
Tigslarlowducken (IND-F)
Azerubia (FED-F)
Krovx Belgium (FED-RGBN)
Neo-Caduceo (IND-CAD)
Candidates for JusticeTigslarlowducken (IND-F)
Krovx Belgium (FED-RGBN)
Battadia (UPP-F)
Relevant Law1. As a candidate, you are required to answer all questions asked to you by the Founder (Renegalle) and the Speaker of the House (Elysium) during this Debate or you will be automatically disqualified (§B.4.1).
Required: Questions for All Prime Ministerial Candidates1. What makes you the best candidate for Prime Minister? What do you bring to the office which your opponent does not and why do you think you are better positioned to succeed in whatever you undertake?
2. How do you plan to address growth, specifically the lack there of? Please provide a specific plan that addresses every aspect of government and community.
3. Who would you appoint to your ideal Cabinet (ex-members, people who would be ineligible, and people not necessarily willing to serve can be included)? Why would you choose these people and what specific things would they bring to each office that you consider to be most important?
4. If elected, how do you plan (if at all) to change the structure of the existing Ministries? Would you consider abolishing, creating, or merging any of them? Why?
5. None of you are incumbents or have previously served as PM of Force, what makes you think you have the experience to be PM?
6. What is your plan to expand Foreign Affairs after the recent events leading to the resignation of Sir Salibaic?
7. As you are both Federalists, why do you think the opposition deserves your vote?
ONLY TO KROVX BELGIUM8. You are the only territorial native running for PM. Do you think this will hinder your ability to develop the capital?
9. How will you balance your responsibilities as PM with your other offices in the Union?
Required: Questions for All House of Representatives Candidates1. Which House Bills do you plan to pass and/or repeal? Why?
2. In what ways should the Constitution be amended, if at all? Explain how the changes would improve the current system of governance.
3. What qualifies you to serve in the House? What makes this qualifying?
4. Do you think any changes should be made to existing House Procedures? If so, what changes should be made and why?
5. If elected, do you plan on running for Speaker? If so, what makes you a good candidate for this position and if not, who do you think would be a better candidate?
6. Do you think the way in which impeachment works should change? Should the power to impeach rest with the House or should it perhaps be given directly to the citizens?
Only to Krovx Belgium and Tigslarlowducken7. How will you balance your responsibilities as Justice and as a House Member?
Required: Questions for All High Court Candidates1. The Justices are responsible for deciding the punishment for a person found guilty, following a trial. You are required to do so with the advice of the Jury. With this in mind, how would you balance your own thoughts on how harsh punishment should be with the Jury's recommendation?
2. The Justices are responsible for determining whether any laws contradict the Constitution. With this power in mind, what method(s) would you use to come to a decision as to the legality of a law? If a law was not necessarily illegal but went against the character of the Constitution, would you consider that fair grounds for it to be overturned?
3. Do you believe it is more important to take your time when deciding the verdict for a case, even if it means the guilty party goes longer without punishment, or do you believe it is more important to quickly decide on a verdict, even if it means the punishment may not be as suitable as otherwise? What factors would tilt this more in favour of one or the other?
4. Similarly to Q2, if a case was brought to the court against someone who had not necessarily done something that was illegal, but went against the character of the Constitution, would you consider that fair grounds for the case to be considered?
5. In what way, if at all, would you like to see the Judiciary changed or reformed?
Only to Krovx Belgium and Battadia6. How will you be sure to act non-partisan despite representing a political party?